|
City of Rome v U.S.
446 U.S. 156 [1980]
Author: Sam Biers
Federal Power to Regulate Private Conduct
under the 14th - Remedial Power
Relevant Facts: In 1966,
appellant city of Rome, Ga., made certain changes in its
electoral system, including provisions for majority rather than
plurality vote for each of the nine members of the City
Commission; for three numbered posts within each of the three
(reduced from nine) wards; and for staggered terms for the
commissioners and for members of the Board of Education from each
ward; and a requirement that members of the Board reside in the
wards from which they were elected. The Voting Rights Act
required pre-clearance by either the AG or 3 judge panel.
The Ag refused, b/c population is
predominantly white and racial bloc voting has been common, the
chgs would deprive non-whites voters opportunity to elect their
choice.
Legal Issue(s): Whether
Congress has the constitutional authority to enact and enforce
the Voting Rights Act upon the electoral changes made by the City
of Rome by way and through the 15th Amendment?
Courts Holding: Yes
Procedure: City filed
declaratory judgment action seeking relief from Voting Rights
Act. The Three-Judge D Ct granted summary for dfs, and pls
appealed. S. Ct. Affirmed.
Law or Rule(s): Act
requires pre-clearance of any change in a Standard,
practice, or procedure with respect to voting, UNLESS the
both discriminatory purpose and effect were absent.
Court Rationale: {Virginia}
Congress is authorized to enforce the prohibitions by
appropriate legislation. Congress has full remedial powers
to effectuate the constitutional prohibitions against racial
discrimination in voting. The Act requires that new
voting rules must be pre-cleared, and lack discriminatory purpose
and effect, and the use of federal examiners are appropriate
methods to enforce the 15th. Under which
Congress may prohibit state actions that perpetuate the effects
of past discrimination, directly through the 14ths Equal
Protection. The electoral changes within a jurisdiction with hx
such as GAs creates the risk of purposeful discrimination
unless Congress has implemented the ban w/o conditions.
Principles of federalism may be overridden by appropriate
legislation to enforce Civil War Amendments. The 15th
supercedes state power exertions and the Act is an appropriate
means for carrying out Congress constitutional
responsibilities. The extension of the Act, was a Constit.
method of enforcing the 15th.
Plaintiffs Argument:
The Act is unconstitutional b/c it exceeds Congress power
to enforce the 15th Amendment where only
discriminatory effect occur absent discriminatory intent.
Defendants Argument:
The Act determines that new voting rules must lack discriminatory
purpose and effect, if not AG is not required to preclear those
changes in a district with a hx for racial discrimination
pertaining to voting.
MINORITY - Under the 15th
Congress may impose only constit. deprivations to remedy
violations of voting rights. Rome has not denied nor
abridged the voting rights of blacks. Federal review
(pre-clearance), of local practices reduces the influence
citizens have over policies affecting them, and strips locally
elected officials of their autonomy to chart policy.
S. C. held that: (1) city could not use
bailout procedure of Voting Rights Act; (2) Congress intended
that voting practice not be precleared unless both discriminatory
purpose and effect were absent; (3) Act did not exceed Congress'
power to enforce Fifteenth Amendment; (4) Act did not violate
principles of federalism; (5) extension of Act was a
constitutional method of enforcing Fifteenth Amendment; and (6)
district court's findings that city failed to prove that
electoral changes in annexations disapproved by Attorney General
did not have discriminatory effect were not clearly erroneous.
Remedial - helpful, corrective or curative
15th Amendment -Sec. 1 The
citizens right to vote shall not be denied or abridged by
U.S. or State on account of race, color, or previous condition of
servitude.
Sec 2: Congress shall have power to enforce
this article by appropriate legislation.
Vitiate - to impair make void, destroy or
annul.
|