| Title
& Citation |
Drennan
v. Star Paving Co. 51 Cal. 2d 409, 333 P.2d
757 (1958) |
| Court |
California
Supreme Court |
| Issue |
Does
one partys reliance on an offer make the offer
irrevocable? |
| Arguments |
P
general contractor Relied to his detriment
on Ds quote. |
| D
sub D revoked offer before it was accepted.
There was no K. |
| Procedure |
P
sued D to recover damages caused by D refusing to perform
paving work according to a bid. P won verdict in trial
court. D appealed. |
| Fact |
Ds
estimator gave a 7K quote for paving work to Ps
secretary. P computed the bid for the overall job
and relied on Ds quote. P posted a 317K bond
to guarantee the bid and won the contract. The next
day, D informed P that D needed 15K, not 7K, to perform
the paving work. P explained that he relied on D
when determining the bid and would need D to honor the
quote. D refused so P hired another sub for 11K to
do the job. |
| Reference |
M.F.
Kemper Const. Co v. City of Los Angeles - D relies on
cases where bids could be revoked because the bidders
mistake was known or should have been known to the
offeree. Court rejects argument. 2nd RSTMT §90
a promise which the promisor should reasonably expect to
induce action or forbearance
is binding if
injustice can be avoided only by enforcing the promise.
|
| Holding |
Yes,
Affirmed D had reason not only to expect plaintiff
to rely on its bid but to want him to. Clearly, D
had a stake in Ps reliance. |
| Rule
/ Reason |
Merely
acting in justifiable reliance on an offer may in some
cases serve as sufficient reason for making the promise
binding. The loss resulting from the mistake should
fall on the party who caused it. |
| Dissent |
|
| Comments |
Court
notes that if Ds bid expressly stated or implied
that it was revocable at any time before acceptance, D
would not be liable. |