 |
 |
 |
| |
|
|
Brooks v
State
S. Ct. Ohio 1878
Author:- Sam Biers
Facts: Df found a roll of money $200. The owner published a notice in the newspaper. The df found the money a month afterward and did not discover who owned it or make notice of the discovery.
Issue: Whether df can commit larceny when he finds money a month after it was casually lost?
Holding: Yes
Procedure: Jury trial conviction for larceny. Affirmed.
Rule: When a person finds goods that have been actually lost and takes possession with intent to appropriate them to his own use, believing that the owner can be found is larceny.
Ct. Rationale: The df was bound to use diligence or to take pains in making a search for the owner of the money. The person last in possession retains constructive possession until he abandons, gives it away or another acquires its possession lawfully. The df intended to steal the money as evidenced by his non-disclosure to his coworkers and lack of diligence in determining the owner.
PL A: The df found the money which was lost, took possession with the intent to appropriate it for his own use with looking for the owner.
Df A: The property was lost for several weeks and the owner ceased to search for it, without a mark on the money, the owner is whomever finds it.