4LawSchool Home - Contact Us

4LawSchool
Criminal Law & Criminal Procedure Case Briefs

Search Tips

 
Home > Case Briefs Bank > Criminal Law & Criminal Procedure

Email This Brief To A Friend Printer Friendly Version






 

Wyoming v. Houghton 
United States Supreme Court, 1999. 

Statement of the Case:

      Wyoming is appealing a suppression of evidence when they charged the ? with felony methamphetamine possession but was ruled to have violated the 4th amendment when they searched the ?’s, a passenger’s, purse without a warrant.

Procedure:

      Trial court denied the motion to suppress, appellate court affirmed, and WY supreme court reversed for ?.

Facts:

        Driver was pulled over on suspicion drugs were in the car.  Purse was left on seat of the car.  ? claimed that purse was hers, and it turned out her ID showed she lied about her name. Further inspection of purse showed drugs in it.  There was probable cause to stop and search car, but no search warrant was issued.

Issue:

      Whether a search of a purse found inside a car violated the 4th Amendment when the search was of a passenger’s belongings inside a car where there was probable cause to believe the car contained contraband.

Procedural Result:

      Reversed for State.

Holding:

      A search of a purse found inside a car DOES NOT violate the 4th Amendment when the search was of a passenger’s belongings inside a car where there was probable cause to believe the car contained contraband.

Reasoning:

  • Police had probable cause drugs were in the car.
  • During whole history of America, it was assumed that a lawful search of a vehicle included a search of any container that might conceal the object of the search.
  • Ross Rule:  If probable cause justifies the search of a lawfully stopped vehicle, it justifies the search of every part of the vehicle and its contents that may conceal the object of the search.
    • Applies broadly, regardless to ownership of the container.
  • Rule:  Passengers, no less than drivers, possess a reduced expectation of privacy with regard to the property that they transport in cars, which travel public thoroughfares.

Concurring:

  • Rule only applies to automobile searches.
  • Does not extend to searches of the people found in the vehicle.

Additional Points:

  • Houghton
    • Probable cause to search a car does not justify a body search of a passenger.
    • Probable cause to search is a necessary predicate for application of the automobile doctrine.

Suggest a link.

Other Resources

4Law.net
Legal portal for non-lawyers.

Law School Message Board
The largest law school message board.


Law School Discussion
More than 6,000,000 posts about law school!

Law Student Paradise
A popular law school discussion forum.


Outline Bank
The 4LawSchool outline bank.

Law School Rankings
Ranking law schools by career placement.