4LawSchool Home - Contact Us

4LawSchool
Civil Procedure Case Briefs

Search Tips

 
Home > Case Briefs Bank > Civil Procedure

Email This Brief To A Friend Printer Friendly Version






 

Strawbridge v. Curtiss
7 U.S. 267 (1806)
Author: Jim

Facts: P, a resident of Massachusetts, brought action against D, a resident of Vermont, and other Ds, residents of Massachusetts. Action brought in Federal Court based on diversity of citizenship.

Procedure: Lower court dismissed for lack of subject matter jrx.

Issue: Does federal court have subject matter jurisdiction when one defendant is from different state but other defendants from the same state as P?

Holding: No

Rationale: You need complete diversity in order to have subject matter jrx. Even one D who is from the same state as the P, destroys diversity.

Note: Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction over cases brought under federal laws (federal question jurisdiction) or under diversity of citizenship (complete diversity). For Diversity of Citizenship, see 28 U.S.C. 1332.

 

Suggest a link.

Other Resources

4Law.net
Legal portal for non-lawyers.

Law School Message Board
The largest law school message board.


Law School Discussion
More than 6,000,000 posts about law school!

Law Student Paradise
A popular law school discussion forum.


Outline Bank
The 4LawSchool outline bank.

Law School Rankings
Ranking law schools by career placement.