|
World-Wide
Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson [Robinson]
444 U.S. 286 (1980)
Author: Jim
Facts:
Defendant World-Wide Volkswagen is a wholesale distributor which
is based in New York. It supplies vehicles and parts to
dealerships in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut.
Defendant Seaway is a car dealership that is located in New York
and receives vehicles form World-Wide. The plaintiffs bought
an Audi from Seaway and while they were driving this vehicle in
Oklahoma, they were struck by a drunk driver and the care busted
into flames and the plaintiffs were severely burned. The
plaintiffs brought suit against the defendants in an Oklahoma
court.
Procedure:
The trial court ruled that the ct. had jurisdiction over the
defendants. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed.
Issue:
Can the Oklahoma court practice in personam jurisdiction over the
defendants under the given circumstances?
Holding:
No
Rationale:
Even though the courts have extended the jurisdiction criteria
since the days of Pennoyer, but limitations still exist and state
lines are still important under the Due Process Clause of the
Constitution. The defendants in the current case did not
have any business in Oklahoma, had no agents in Oklahoma, showed
no advertisement in Oklahoma. So the plaintiffs seek to
establish minimum contact through this one isolated incident that
occurred in Oklahoma. Furthermore, the ruling to the
Oklahoma Sp. Ct. that an automobile is extremely mobile and
therefore it was foreseeable for the defendants that one of their
vehicles will travel into Oklahoma is also without merit.
Foreseeability alone has never been sufficient benchmark for
personal jurisdiction under Due Process Clause.
Foreseeability comes into play when the defendants contacts with
the forum state are such that the defendant can foresee that he
will be held under the forum states jurisdiction is
conflict arises. Therefore, just because the defendants put
a product in the stream of commerce does not mean that they
formed the sufficient contact with Oklahoma to be held under its
jurisdiction.
|