4LawSchool Home - Contact Us

4LawSchool
Criminal Law & Criminal Procedure Case Briefs

Search Tips

 
Home > Case Briefs Bank > Criminal Law & Criminal Procedure

Email This Brief To A Friend Printer Friendly Version






 

Estate of Murdock, 32 Muc. 352 (1983).
Author: Jim

Facts: Husband and wife died in plane crash.  They had separate wills and in the wills stated that their property will go to surviving spouse and if no surviving spouse, his/her children.  So crucial to see who died first.  Testimony of witness presented that husband uttered at the crash scene that he was alive.  Trial court excluded this statement because hearsay.

Issue:  Was the out-of-court statement of husband hearsay?

Holding: NO

Rationale:  The out-of-court statement was not admitted to prove the truth of the matter asserted.  It was only presented to show that husband said something and he was alive.  The husband could have said "I AM DEAD" and still this statement will prove that he was actually alive.  So the use of this statement did not depend on husband's memory, perception or truthfulness and it was not hearsay.


Suggest a link.

Other Resources

4Law.net
Legal portal for non-lawyers.

Law School Message Board
The largest law school message board.


Law School Discussion
More than 6,000,000 posts about law school!

Law Student Paradise
A popular law school discussion forum.


Outline Bank
The 4LawSchool outline bank.

Law School Rankings
Ranking law schools by career placement.