4LawSchool Home - Contact Us

4LawSchool
Property Briefs

Search Tips

 
Home > Case Briefs Bank > Property

Email This Brief To A Friend Printer Friendly Version






 

Johnson v. M’Intosh
21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823)
Author: Jim

Facts:  Plaintiff claims title to land that he got from Indian chiefs in 1773 and in 1775.   The Indian chiefs were working under the proper authority of their tribes when they sold their lands to the plaintiff.

Issue: Do the U.S. courts recognize Indians sale of titles of land to private individuals?

Holding: No

Rationale:  The Europeans conquered the land from the Indians and Indians were only given the occupancy rights and they were never given the right to sell their land.  According to the court, absolute property rights cannot be shared by 2 different entities.  Therefore, England originally enjoyed the absolute property rights to the lands in question and the Indians only enjoyed the occupancy rights to the land.  After the Revolutionary War, England transferred these absolute rights to the United States. Therefore, the Indian chiefs did not enjoy the right to sell the land to private individuals.

Suggest a link.

Other Resources

4Law.net
Legal portal for non-lawyers.

Law School Message Board
The largest law school message board.


Law School Discussion
More than 6,000,000 posts about law school!

Law Student Paradise
A popular law school discussion forum.


Outline Bank
The 4LawSchool outline bank.

Law School Rankings
Ranking law schools by career placement.